Why Sanctions Compliance Matters in M&A Transactions

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are high-stakes operations that can reshape businesses, open new markets, and create growth opportunities. However, the increasing complexity of global sanctions regimes introduces significant challenges for dealmakers. Sanctions compliance is no longer a post-closing consideration—it is a critical element at every stage of the transaction. Failure to address sanctions can lead to legal liabilities, financial losses, and reputational damage.

This article explores the importance of sanctions compliance in M&A and highlights key considerations for navigating this evolving landscape.

{{snippets-guide}}

Understanding the Sanctions Landscape

Sanctions regimes are rapidly changing, particularly in response to geopolitical conflicts. The UK, US, EU, and other jurisdictions frequently introduce new restrictions that target specific individuals, companies, and sectors. These measures can directly impact M&A transactions, especially when they involve entities with ties to sanctioned countries or industries.

Comprehending which sanctions apply to your transaction is essential. Sanctions may restrict dealings with certain financial institutions, prohibit new investments, or even ban specific exports or imports. For instance, UK sanctions prohibit acquiring ownership interests in entities connected to Russia. US sanctions may extend to transactions where financing or facilitation involves US persons. This intricate web of rules demands thorough analysis to ensure compliance.

Sanctions in Target Due Diligence

Due diligence is the cornerstone of any successful M&A deal, and sanctions compliance adds another layer of scrutiny. Identifying whether a target company—or its wider group—operates in a sanctioned jurisdiction or engages with sanctioned entities is vital.

Businesses with Russian operations face heightened scrutiny. Even indirect exposure, such as deriving significant revenue from Russia or sourcing materials from sanctioned suppliers, can create compliance risks. Understanding the ownership structure of the target is critical. Transactions involving companies with sanctioned beneficial owners or front companies can lead to regulatory penalties or blocked deals.

Dealmakers should adopt a robust due diligence framework that evaluates exposure to sanctions across the target’s operations, supply chains, and counterparties.

Implications for Financing and Deal Structuring

Sanctions significantly influence how M&A deals are financed and structured. Restrictions on financial institutions in sanctioned jurisdictions, coupled with export and import controls, can create obstacles for completing transactions.

For instance, transferring regulated goods, technology, or software to a target in a sanctioned country may require specific licenses or approvals. Furthermore, many banks and financial institutions hesitate to process transactions involving sanctioned entities, even when technically permitted. This cautious approach can delay financing or result in the outright denial of services.

To navigate these challenges, deal teams must involve legal and financial advisors early to design compliant transaction structures that account for potential sanctions-related barriers.

Risks of Post-Closing Non-Compliance

Compliance challenges do not end when the ink dries on the deal documents. Post-closing activities, such as integrating operations or managing contractual obligations, can expose businesses to sanctions risks.

For instance, continuing business relationships with sanctioned entities, directly or indirectly, may violate existing sanctions regimes. Additionally, Western sanctions increasingly target professional services, including accounting and management consulting, further complicating post-acquisition operations in sanctioned jurisdictions.

Proactively addressing these risks involves implementing a sanctions compliance programme that monitors and mitigates potential breaches across the newly acquired entity.

Directors’ Liabilities and Corporate Governance

Directors and executives must be vigilant about their responsibilities under sanctions regulations. Individuals involved in approving or facilitating prohibited activities may face personal liability, including fines or imprisonment.

In the UK, for example, the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) imposes strict liability for sanctions breaches and has the authority to “name and shame” violators. These risks underscore the importance of strong corporate governance. Companies should consider implementing recusal policies and seeking external legal advice for decisions involving sanctioned jurisdictions.

Mitigating Sanctions Risks in M&A

Mitigating sanctions risks requires a comprehensive approach that integrates legal expertise, compliance frameworks, and continuous monitoring. Key strategies include:

Early Engagement with Legal Advisors

Engaging legal advisors with expertise in sanctions compliance at the earliest stages of planning an M&A transaction is essential. These professionals can help identify red flags before they escalate into costly problems. By mapping out the sanctions regimes applicable to the transaction—whether UK, US, EU, or others—legal advisors ensure that all stakeholders understand the scope of the risks involved.

Sanctions experts can also assess whether the deal requires specific licenses, notifications, or approvals from regulatory bodies. For example, transactions involving export-controlled technologies or sensitive jurisdictions may demand pre-clearance to proceed. Additionally, they can provide guidance on structuring the deal to avoid inadvertent breaches of sanctions laws. Engaging advisors early allows deal teams to incorporate compliance measures into negotiations and avoid disruptions that could derail the transaction.

Enhanced Due Diligence

Standard due diligence processes often fall short when sanctions risks are involved. Enhanced due diligence goes deeper, evaluating not just the target’s operations but also its counterparties, supply chains, and ownership structures. This level of scrutiny is particularly important when the target operates in or trades with high-risk jurisdictions, such as those subject to comprehensive sanctions like Russia or Iran.

Enhanced due diligence includes verifying the identity and background of the target’s ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) to ensure they are not on sanctions lists. It also involves assessing revenue streams to determine whether they are derived from or routed through sanctioned entities or jurisdictions. Even indirect exposure—such as reliance on suppliers or distributors based in a sanctioned country—can pose significant risks. This granular approach ensures that hidden liabilities are uncovered before the transaction proceeds.

Tailored Compliance Programmes

Every M&A transaction presents unique sanctions risks, requiring compliance programmes that are specifically designed for the circumstances of the deal. A one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate when different jurisdictions impose varying sanctions and enforcement standards. Tailored programmes should address both the pre- and post-closing phases of the transaction.

Before closing, compliance measures might include enhanced screening of counterparties, obtaining licenses for restricted transactions, and structuring the deal to minimise exposure to sanctions risks. Post-closing, the focus shifts to integrating the acquired entity into the buyer’s existing compliance framework. This could involve updating internal policies, training staff on new sanctions obligations, and implementing monitoring systems to ensure ongoing compliance. A well-designed compliance programme not only mitigates risks but also demonstrates to regulators that the business takes its obligations seriously.

Clear Contractual Protections

Incorporating robust contractual protections into deal documents is a vital step in managing sanctions risks. Representations and warranties should require the seller to confirm that the target has not violated any applicable sanctions laws. This ensures that the buyer is not inheriting hidden liabilities or unknowingly entering into non-compliant business relationships.

Covenants can be included to ensure that the seller takes specific actions, such as ceasing dealings with sanctioned entities or obtaining necessary regulatory approvals, before the deal closes. Indemnities should be drafted to protect the buyer against potential fines, penalties, or losses resulting from sanctions breaches discovered post-closing. Finally, material adverse change (MAC) clauses can offer an additional layer of protection, allowing the buyer to exit the deal if new sanctions materially impact the target’s value or operations.

By aligning these contractual safeguards with the findings from due diligence and legal advice, deal teams can allocate risks appropriately and build a more resilient transaction structure.

Leveraging Sanctions Screening Software

Sanctions screening software has become an invaluable tool in mitigating risks during M&A transactions, offering an efficient and reliable way to identify potential compliance issues. These systems automatically cross-reference individuals, companies, and jurisdictions involved in a transaction against global sanctions lists such as those maintained by the UK Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and the EU.

Modern sanctions screening tools often include advanced features such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), which can enhance their ability to detect indirect or complex connections to sanctioned entities. For example, they can flag transactions involving a third-party intermediary that may be linked to a sanctioned individual or organisation. These tools also provide real-time updates, ensuring that screening efforts account for the constantly evolving landscape of global sanctions.

In the context of M&A, sanctions screening software is particularly valuable during due diligence, helping deal teams identify red flags early in the process. It can also be used post-closing to integrate the target’s operations into the acquirer’s compliance programme, ensuring that ongoing activities remain sanctions-compliant.

When selecting a screening tool, businesses should ensure it meets the specific needs of the transaction. Key factors include the tool’s ability to screen against multiple jurisdictions’ sanctions lists, its adaptability to complex corporate structures, and its capacity to generate detailed audit trails for regulatory reporting. By incorporating sanctions screening software into the compliance toolkit, dealmakers can significantly reduce the risk of inadvertent violations and streamline their due diligence processes.

{{snippets-case}}

Conclusion: Sanctions Compliance in M&A

Sanctions compliance is a critical component of M&A transactions in today’s interconnected and geopolitically sensitive environment. Navigating this complex landscape demands proactive planning, expert advice, and robust compliance mechanisms. By addressing sanctions risks head-on, businesses can safeguard their investments, maintain regulatory compliance, and avoid reputational harm.

In an era where sanctions regimes are increasingly dynamic, compliance is not just a legal obligation—it is a strategic imperative.

sanctions.io is a highly reliable and cost-effective solution for sanctions screening. With AI-powered technology, an enterprise-grade API boasting 99.99% uptime, and an easy-to-use portal, it’s no surprise that customers worldwide trust sanctions.io to enhance their compliance processes.

Book a free Discovery Call now. We also encourage you to take advantage of our free 7-day trial (no credit card is required).